Pajamasmedia asked:
Andrew Klavan reveals the strategy used to silence the criticism and ideas of conservative thinkers.
Earn money from search engine clicks
Bravo Andrew Klavan
Oh my god seriously Klavan. Shut the fuck up. The word “Neutrality” would sound like “shut up” to someone with as much of an agenda as yourself.
Anti-individualist? I would argue that restricting abortion, having ‘free speech zones’, and the numerous other reactionary 9/11 policies are much more anti-individualist than most Lefty policies.
Anti-Religious? Who are you shitting? The constitution doesn’t say religion should determine public policy. It says we should have the right to worship how we please. Don’t confuse the two.
Anti-Patriotic? C’mon now, anyone can bullshit and say they’re being more patriotic than the other guy.
@SCOTTSCARBOROUGH1 I’ll tolerate you and tell you you’re wrong at the same time. OH NO SCARY UNION THUGS
Freedom of speech means the government can’t silence you, it doesn’t force passers-by to support your political agenda.
@Scarface1034 they’re ranks have grown to 171!
An opponent of net neutrality wants to complain about being told to shut up? Apparently he would prefer being FORCED to shut up. Too bad, Andrew. No matter how much you WANT to be silenced, you will still be tolerated. Even though you fear tolerance. You have as much right to your deluded fantasy world as anyone else.
Network neutrality (also net neutrality, Internet neutrality) is a principle proposed for users’ access to networks participating in the Internet. The principle advocates no restrictions by Internet service providers and governments on content, sites, platforms, the kinds of equipment that may be attached, and the modes of communication.
This limits conservatives speech by…by…wait a minute
i don’t get it… my liberal teachers say to accept all people for their customs, views and values. but why do they hate us republicans so much?
Tolerance is ok with liberals…until you disagree. Great video!
AM ONE OF THEM LIBERAL TROLLS. STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS MAN CHOWDER. STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS MAN CHOWDER, STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS MAN CHOWDER, STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS MAN CHOWDER, STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS MAN CHOWDER, STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS MAN CHOWDER, STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS MAN CHOWDER, STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS MAN CHOWDER, STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS MAN CHOWDER, STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS MAN CHOWDER, STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS MAN CHOWDER, STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS MAN CHOWDER,
andrew klaven is a highly paid ass
andrew klaven in a highly paid ass
@Scarface1034 Wrong!…. It’s 166 now
@Brajabu74 AM ONE OF THEM LIBERAL TROLLS. STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS MAN CHOWDER. STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS MAN CHOWDER, STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS MAN CHOWDER, STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS MAN CHOWDER, STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS MAN CHOWDER, STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS MAN CHOWDER, STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS MAN CHOWDER, STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS MAN CHOWDER, STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS MAN CHOWDER, STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS MAN CHOWDER, STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS MAN CHOWDER, STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS MAN CHOWDER,
@marine43 You keep confusing net neutrality with the fairness doctrine. IT’S NOT THE SAME THING. Net neutrality is what we have always had on the internet and it means that an ISP can not control the access to information that you stream – i,e, they are neutral. That is all. Corporations want to get rid of this neutral model so they charge more for some content or restrict it. Whatever the merits of net neutral it is not the same as fairness doctrine that ended a long time ago. NOT THE SAME.
@Ashen83 I think that many conservatives have become lemmings to opinion makers from their side. That they can get Net Neutrality confused with the fairness doctrine show shows something is wrong with how many conservative lay people get information or process it.
@MyFreedomChannel So you want me to buzz off now? In other words you are telling me to “shut up”? Net Neutrality is how the internet has always operated and continues to do for now and the Fairness Doctrine is something totally different. That you don’t know what Net Neutrality is shows your ignorance and that your opinion is worthless. I would respect the opinion against Net Neutrality if the person offering it knew what it was he was opining about.
@Scarface1034 I am not responsible for your ignorance.
@viletree Thank God, I am not the only conservative that feels this way about Klavan and his ilk. I did not know there were many of us true bloods left.
@SupernautG
Way to be clear and concise. I now understand perfectly your position on this matter. Note the sarcasm.
@MyFreedomChannel Is that the new right wing meme? That when you are shown facts that you are wrong it is the left telling your side to “shut up”? Net Neutrality means that your IP provider does not block or restrict what you get streamed to you on the internet. IP providers want to for example restrict traffic and divert it to media companies they own. They for example want to restrict PJmedia in favor of their own news feeds. Now they are not allowed to do that. Get your facts right.
@Tehbeefer1 A) The govt invented the internet. B) Net neutrality is what we have now and always had. “Net Neutrality means that Internet service providers may not discriminate between different kinds of content and applications online.”
@Scarface1034 Stupid people like Klavan need to be told to shut up eventually. Net Neutrality has zero to do with the old fairness doctrine – not even close. How can he have gotten that so wrong? Either Klavan is ignorant or is telling a lie on purpose.
@anoncastillo If this Klavan guy does not know what net neutrality is and like you said like it or not as an idea – it has ZERO to do with the radio fairness doctrine – it is not even related to that concept. Net neutrality just means that your online provider treats all data streams to you computer the same and does not favor content (and charge you or say a company like netflix more) while favoring WB content. This alone proves what this Klavan guy is a joke.